post-template-default single single-post postid-12656 single-format-standard

Indiana Farmer taking Monsanto to Supreme Court

Alex Constantine - October 7, 2012

By Anne Sewell

Digital Journal, October 7, 201

Washington – Vernon Hugh Bowman, a 74-year-old soybean farmer, will have his day in court against Monsanto in the US Supreme Court next year. Bowman was originally sued by Monsanto Co for alleged patent infringement for the use of a genetically modified soybean crop.

Under the company's licensing contract, farmers can only use the product to harvest one round of crops. However, Monsanto sued Bowman because they say he is at fault for planting a second harvest. However, this second harvest came from commercially-purchased "commodity seeds" from a grain elevator that contained, in part, the Roundup Ready GMO seeds.

Apparently  you can sell "second-generation" seeds to grain elevators for use as "commodity  seeds," and Monsanto doesn't require that there be any restriction on the sale.

However, Monsanto claimed this was  infringement, even though the seeds were legally sold to the grain elevator and  then from the elevator to Bowman without restrictions.

While  Bowman had signed an agreement for his original seeds, he did not with this  batch.  Even Monsanto admits he didn't break the user agreement - just patent  infringement for using the seeds.

The US Federal Circuit Court of Appeals  upheld an $84,456 damages ruling awarded to Monsanto in September 2011.  However  Bowman vowed to appeal this ruling and has now got the attention of the highest  court in the US.  The Supreme  Courthas agreed to hear his case and they expect it to happen in  Washington, DC in January or February of 2013.

According to the Las  Vegas Sun, the Obama administration urged the court not to take the case and  warned that the outcome could affect patents involving DNA molecules,  nanotechnologies and other self-replicating technologies.

Bowman is arguing in his appeal that  the Federal Circuit decision favoring Monsanto was incorrect, as an earlier  court had agreed that Monsanto had no rights on how its product was used after  it was sold to consumers.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *