post-template-default single single-post postid-65589 single-format-standard
Constantine Report
Donate
The Posthumous Lynching of OJ Simpson

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2022 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least 15 minutes. Market data provided by Factset. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions.  Legal Statement. Mutual Fund and ETF data provided by Refinitiv Lipper.

The Posthumous Lynching of OJ Simpson

Alex Constantine - April 16, 2024

By Alex Constantine

The death of OJ was reported on Friday, and the cable news shows responded by interviewing only hostile commentators who sided with the prosecution. Not one legal advocate for the defense, or independent journalist with an informed view of the case, was called on to provide an opposing opinion.

Jake Tapper's segment on CNN was typical. Tapper interviewed Bob Coastas -- a career sportscaster -- who said:

"He was not a typical African-American person standing charged with a crime. He had his celebrity, he had his enormous popularity, he had the resources to have a great defense team. But he somehow became the avatar, in the minds of many, for all these other ongoing, centuries-old issues that are very legitimate issues, and he actually benefited from some of that. If I could give him the benefit of any doubt, I would. But someone asked me once, 'do you think OJ did it?' I said, 'yes.' And he said, 'why' And I said, 'because I live on this planet.' The evidence just adds up to nothing else."

These exact talking points made their way to all of the networks without a hint of deviation.

Never mind that a sportscaster isn't qualified to render a legal opinion, or that Costas was a college drop-out. The sportscaster delivered comments that appeared to be off-the-cuff, but were obviously scripted to trigger racial resentment.

OJ wasn't a "typical" black man. White society accepted and admired him. Very unusual. He was a celebrity. This had something to do with the verdict. Popular, rich celebrity rap artists are often convicted of crimes, but forget about them. This isn't a rational argument, go with your gut.

If Simpson was a typical obscure black man, the unpopular kind, he'd have gotten the chair. Isn't this how it is supposed to work? His celebrity status swayed the jury and Simpson was acquitted. Costas had no factual basis to support his viewpoint. He didn't cite data. Neither did the other commentators over at MSNBC who drove home the same bit of conjecture.

OJ was rich. He could afford highly competent attorneys -- a very unusual black man, indeed. Highly-paid lawyers know how to maneuver around the evidence, weave spells that substitute for valid legal arguments. Typical black men can only afford incompetent lawyers. They go to jail. This is universally understood. Stop thinking about it. Listen to your innards.

Costas does, so he opined that some irrational types -- a vast majority of African-Americans, in fact -- sided with Simpson because he was black, not because they have an understanding of the legal system that an atypically wealthy, popular, white celebrity  sportscaster doesn't share.

The cable punditocracy always claims that their conclusions are based on evidence. That is, the evidence presented by prosecutors, as they explained it. But, apart from the gloves that were a little too tight, they don't discuss evidence. They talk about OJ's race, his celebrity status, his highly-paid voodoo attorneys, the jury's apportionment of melatonin, everything but the evidence.

I've gone over it piece by piece. As Cochran stated in his courtroom summation, "the evidence doesn't make sense." He didn't perjure himself. Trained police investigators trampled through blood at the crime scene. Oops. Socks OJ wore the night of the murders were examined by skilled forensic examiners -- twice. Not a drop of blood was found. But the third examination found "copious amounts of blood." If OJ committed the murders, blood would have been found on his socks the first time around. The blood stains on Simpson's car door and Nicole's rear gate actually enlarged themselves a month after the murders.

And where did he ditch his bloody clothes? They were never found. This had to be explained, so conservative commentators speculated that he changed his clothes after returning home, stuffed them in a duffel bag and disposed of them. So he returned home with blood-drenched apparel, walked through the house to his bedroom closet, but not a drop of blood from was deposited on the carpet, or anywhere else in the house. Pardon my skepticism.

An advocate for the defense might have pointed out the many evidentiary contractions and anomalies in the case. But only one side was permitted to speak. Repeatedly, OJ's social status, wealth and expensive legal representation were said to have some material connection to his acquittal. It was the same line of reasoning on every major channel

I have written about the case myself. When I was gathering evidence on Mafia involvement, I received a graphic death threat. It was delivered personally, man to man, by a thug with a thick New Jersey accent and wavy, black, well-oiled hair. A serial killer since convicted set my apartment building on fire. The blaze was set ten feet from my apartment door. So I nearly lost my files on the Simpson case. Maybe that was the idea. Who sent the arsonist? OJ? Probably not. My own independent investigation didn't focus on him. Someone else wanted to burn me out.

Costas, on the other hand, may "live on this planet," he isn't a crazy independent thinker, but he never really looked into the evidence. He moves in the world of professional team sports. He is on intimate terms with the owners and managers of major league football and baseball teams. A Google search for "NFL and the Mafia" turns up several books on the topic. Professional baseball is also rife with organized crime connections. This may explain why he was eager to discuss The Crime of the Century and spit on OJ's casket. Costas recited scripted, racist, psychologically-manipulative commentary on a national network. it reinforced white biases and put blacks "in their place."

Score!

RELATED: "The Skunk Man and the First Attempt to Kill Nicole Brown Simpson"

79 comments.

  9. I loved as much as youll receive carried out right here The sketch is attractive your authored material stylish nonetheless you command get bought an nervousness over that you wish be delivering the following unwell unquestionably come more formerly again as exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this hike

    Reply

  17. Hi Neat post Theres an issue together with your web site in internet explorer may test this IE still is the marketplace chief and a good component of people will pass over your fantastic writing due to this problem

    Reply

  34. Your article demonstrates an exceptional level of professionalism and expertise. The thoroughness and depth with which you have covered the topic are truly impressive. Readers will greatly benefit from the valuable insights and practical advice you have shared. The clarity of your understanding is evident throughout the entire piece. I anticipate more of your high-quality work in the future. Thank you for offering your profound knowledge and providing such a detailed and enlightening resource.

    Reply

  44. I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here The sketch is attractive your authored material stylish nonetheless you command get got an impatience over that you wish be delivering the following unwell unquestionably come more formerly again since exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this hike

    Reply

  46. Fantastic site Lots of helpful information here I am sending it to some friends ans additionally sharing in delicious And of course thanks for your effort

    Reply

  49. certainly like your website but you need to take a look at the spelling on quite a few of your posts Many of them are rife with spelling problems and I find it very troublesome to inform the reality nevertheless I will definitely come back again

    Reply

  51. I have been browsing online more than three hours today yet I never found any interesting article like yours It is pretty worth enough for me In my view if all website owners and bloggers made good content as you did the internet will be a lot more useful than ever before

    Reply

  55. My brother suggested I might like this blog He was totally right This post actually made my day You can not imagine simply how much time I had spent for this info Thanks

    Reply

  56. obviously like your website but you need to test the spelling on quite a few of your posts Several of them are rife with spelling problems and I to find it very troublesome to inform the reality on the other hand Ill certainly come back again

    Reply

  57. Usually I do not read article on blogs however I would like to say that this writeup very compelled me to take a look at and do it Your writing style has been amazed me Thank you very nice article

    Reply

  58. Thanks I have just been looking for information about this subject for a long time and yours is the best Ive discovered till now However what in regards to the bottom line Are you certain in regards to the supply

    Reply

  65. What i do not realize is in fact how you are no longer actually much more wellfavored than you might be right now Youre very intelligent You recognize thus considerably in relation to this topic made me in my view believe it from numerous numerous angles Its like men and women are not fascinated until it is one thing to do with Lady gaga Your own stuffs excellent All the time handle it up

    Reply

  66. Your blog is a constant source of inspiration for me. Your passion for your subject matter shines through in every post, and it’s clear that you genuinely care about making a positive impact on your readers.

    Reply

  70. I do believe all the ideas youve presented for your post They are really convincing and will certainly work Nonetheless the posts are too short for novices May just you please lengthen them a little from subsequent time Thanks for the post

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *