The attached was penned by Diana Napolis, a highly-competent child abuse investigator for the San Diego court system who was, via classified electronic mind control technology, CONVERTED INTO A POTENTIALLY-LETHAL CELEBRITY STALKER, similar to the manner in which Mark David Chapman was made to stalk John Lennon.
That was mind control, too. (Any “skeptic” ((misinformed dupe)) who wishes to debate this point from an inevitable position of ignorance – the sort that gives a free pass to fascist conspiracies – will lose, so don’t even try. I’ve been arguing with brainwashed zombies for years. Fascism breeds conspiracies. Get used to it because public denial makes it possible.)
In fact, Ms. Napolis attempted to free herself from invasive electronic harassment perpetrated by satainists with ties to military intelligence. I witnessed the assaults on Diana first-hand – and was unable to do much about it.
New York Tourette Syndrome therapist Leslie Packer – who resigned from the APA rather than respond to complaints filed against her – is in league with Aquino and a satanic pedophile ring with links to the Temple of Set. (A brief search of the web and Usenet by any objective researcher will cofirm this statement.)
Packer is the ringleader among Aquino’s “bodyguards.” This clutch – including discredited (by no less than Washington prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald under questioning on the stand in the Scooter Libby trial) “false memory” theorist Elizabeth Loftus – filed bogus cyber-stalking charges against Napolis, who publicized the criminal connections in Usenet posts repeatedly, and was subsequently convicted of “stalking” Aquino, Packer, Loftus, et al.
CIA plants in the San Diego Cox (Mockingbird) press have given credence to the fabricated accusations made against Diana Napolis.
How it happened: Napolis was morally offended by allegations of pedophilia and child abuse related to the Temple of Set – not to mention protection of Aquino and the others by federal and local law enforcement and the DoD – and was herself wrongly convicted. She was subjected to electronic harassment and imprisoned for acting out her programming, a brainwashing regimen that sent Diana packing after Jennifer Love Hewitt.
Need I point out that this is a moral travesty? Packer and her fellow satanists are evading justice. The intelligence and legal communities have facilitated the acts of organized satanists and pedophiles against a courageous activist.
Monsters are breathing down her back. This is Diana’s reward for attempting to protect victims of organized pedophilia – as the former court-appointed child abuse investigator was trained to do. The perpetrators are free to harass anyone they please, rape children and lie about it, employ hardcore tactics. The media and blogosphere support them with planted “Satanic Panic” cover stories promoting the “false memory” bromide for the ritual abuse of children, and furthering the careers of the perps.
Such is the degradation of the legal system and press that the intelligence underground – which, in the past, quietly recruited Nazis Reinhard Gehlen, Martin Bormann and Klaus Barbie – has promulgated.
One day I will write a book about all of this, and it will not be believed by dumbed-down, self-indulgent Americans, who cherry-pick their beliefs defensively, given the freedom to dissociate. I’m not so entitled. As an eight-year victim of CIA torture, I am more inclined to look at reality squarely. It doesn’t appeal to me – and has never been pleasant – but it’s everyone’s responsibility to prevent future Holocausts. This is a very serious case, deserving of much wider scrutiny. But we domestic CIA-DoD torture victims seem to have been abandoned to fend for ourselves via our own devices. Most observers ridicule victims of CIA-DoD mind control experimentation and harsssment. We are in extreme pain. No one seems to care. I am one of them. My life has been destroyed for reporting honestly on fascism, just as Diana’s was destroyed for reporting honestly on satanism and organized pedophilia. We whistle-blowers on the intelligence underground have been universally censored and abused by the media and a brainwashed public.
The TI’s see it very clearly – and know mind control is YOUR problem. We are in pain, but we have no delusions. Good luck, America, with your mind control problem. I’ve tried to warn you, but am moving on to other topics of research and have no use for “kooks.”
Theresa Duncan was murdered for writing on satanism and the intelligence community. I was tortured for years, and nearly been murdered many times … but who cares, eh? It’s well-known that the feds have a remote, portable crowd-control device that heats the body.
I was the guinea-pig in those burn experiments. Someone had to be.
The eight-year torture of Alex Constantine, which no one cared about, taught the bad guys how to torture YOU “kooky” people. ALL BACKS WERE TURNED ON ME … and the truth about John Lennon’s murder … and the vicious assaults on Napolis … and the killings of Robert Kennedy, et al. …. Duncan and Blake … HOW MANY OTHERS?
CIA torture? A revelation? NO. I reported it 2O YEARS AGO – when it was starting up on ME. Who cared, eh? Most Americans had and has better things to think about: Sex. Religion. TV. Nothing.
Peasants.
– Alex Constantine••••••••••••www.Newsfeeds.com
Dr. Leslie Packer, Usenet & Internet Child Pedophile Rings (Repost)
From: Oopsie DoodleSubject: Dr. Leslie Packer, Usenet & Internet Child Pedophile Rings (Repost)Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 13:16:44 +0200, Charles D. Bohne™ wrote:
>On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 17:47:54 +1200, Sir Gilligan Horry>wrote:>>>Leslie Packer>>is a Satanist>>http://www.tourettesyndrome.net/>Tourette Syndrome “Plus” © Copyright 1998 – 2005 Leslie E. Packer
Here’s everything anyone needs to know about Leslie Packer and cohorts whohail from spp, excluded is Aquino’s cult memebers, David Green also from SanDiego.
If you think criminal atrocities can’t be covered up in high places, seethis article about pedophile cover up.
Diana Napolis(Address omitted) Superior Court of CaliforniaCounty of San DiegoCentral CourtTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,Plaintiff,
v.
DIANA LOUISA NAPOLIS,Defendant. Case No. 171331
DECLARATION OF DIANA NAPOLIS IN RESPONSE TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE
Date: February 19, 2003Time: 9:00 a.m.Dept: 15Judge: Hon. Howard H. Shore
Diana Napolis declares as follows:
I am the defendant in these proceedings. I make this declaration in responseto the RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE filed in theseproceedings and presented to the court at the hearing of February 19, 2003,9:00 a.m. My attorney did not file a response to the Board’srecommendations. The Court did not follow the Board’s recommendations.Regardless of the fact that the hearing was held six months ago, it isimportant for my case to make a written record of why the Board’srecommendations are ill-founded and should not be followed by the Court.This is a complex case that can only be understood within the followingcontext:
I have a Masters degree in Transpersonal Psychology and I worked as a CourtInvestigative Social Worker for the County of San Diego from the years1990-96 and as a visitation supervisor for Family Court cases from the years1995-2000 with one year overlapping due to moonlighting during the last yearof work at Child Protective Serves [CPS]. In the year 2000, I obtained myMarriage and Family Therapy License [MFT].
I was following the controversy surrounding the subject of ritual abuse for10 years within CPS, and in the academic community in general, and hadhandled several cases involving ritual abuse claims. There was an attempt tocover-up and down- play ritual abuse within the County of San Diego by aGrand Jury in the early 1990’s, led by a woman by the name of Carol Hopkinswho insisted this type of abuse did not occur. [F1] Due to her activity,during my tenure at CPS and afterwards, I concentrated on gathering evidenceand cases from around the world which proved the existence of ritual abuse.I then went on the Internet under a pseudonym attempting to bring attentionto these crimes and to the irresponsible actions in San Diego County. See myarchive of satanic ritual crime cases at:http://www.newsmakingnews.com/KarenCuriojonesarchive.htm.
I then became interested in tracking the various harassment techniques usedby cults and the False Memory Syndrome Foundation [FMSF] – a politicalorganization defending those accused of ritual abuse, sexual molestation,and mind control atrocities. The targets are usually therapists,investigators and victims who speak out. The silencing and intimidationtechniques used in the 1990’s included harassing lawsuits, threats, andcensorship.
In rare cases, unusual assaults classified under the misnomer of“non-lethal” weaponry, electronic harassment, or psychotronic warfare, werealso used. Psychotronic warfare utilizes directed energy to negativelyaffect the mind. It is discussed in various military journals. In 2001, Rep.Dennis Kucinich introduced a bill in the House of Representatives banning“non-lethal” weaponry, including psychotronic weaponry.
There have been several lawsuits filed in the past 10 years in an attempt tobring this technology to the public’s attention and to name the perpetratorsin an attempt to seek justice. For example, see John St. Clair Akwei vs. NSA– (Attachment A).
It came to the attention of myself and others that not only governments inthird world countries use these technologies against enemies of the state,but countries like the United States and Russia do as well. Such weaponry isa convenient way to dispose of political enemies from a distance, causingirreparable injury without being caught. These weapons also permitexperimentation on an unwitting public without needing to adhere to anystandards of ethical conduct or legal requirements to obtain informedconsent from subjects, requirements of democratic countries like the UnitedStates, especially when field-testing very assaultive, unusual technology.Occasionally a target might be chosen for a specific type of unusual tortureoutside the parameters of what the perpetrators of these assaults define asacceptable. In these case, the perpetrators may attempt to travel outsidetheir own country to find a rogue, clandestine operator to complete the“project”.
There is a famous couple from Russia who not only kill via this technology,but lead the people they kill through their own version of the death anddying process, with the exact opposite intention of Dr. ElizabethKubler-Ross, who was a leader in the study of transitioning others through aconscious “death process” towards the light. The ultimate goal of thesegroups is to silence the political opposition against them and, of course,to escape criminal prosecution when they eventually kill their targets, whousually die in silence and unbelieved because the crime is unseen.
There were several individuals I was following on the Internet during theyears 1995-2000 because of their stated politics and clear agendas toundermine victims. Eventually it appeared that several proponents of theFalse Memory Syndrome Foundation [FMSF] and North American Man-Boy LoveAssociation (NAMBLA) had established networks staged in several internetnewsgroups, clearly operating to censor information and to intimidate othersfrom publicly questioning theirs agendas. They were promoting ideas aboutchild molestation not being very harmful and were in opposition to anyclaims to the contrary. They also mocked victims or advocates who publicizedinformation about ritual abuse and mind control. Eventually these peoplestaged themselves in newsgroups such as sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.mind control, alt.true-crime, etc., and became unusually malicious, andappeared to function as an organized group. A few individuals attempted todiscover my real life identity, which they finally did in the year 2000after stalking me in San Diego County.
My identity was disclosed in the local newspaper, the San DiegoUnion-Tribune, on Sept. 24, 2000. This article was authored by Mark Sauer, afriend of Carol Hopkins, whose story will be told in full later in thisdocument. Mark Sauer quoted: a Lt. Col. Michael Aquino who had been pursuingme; Carol Hopkins, an ex-San Diego Grand Jury member; Dr. Elizabeth Loftus,a memory researcher from the FMSF, and Michelle Devereaux, a satanic cultmember who oftentimes poses as a private investigator.
Because I had been tracking the propaganda techniques of others, as well asthese particular individuals, I was not surprised to see that they did nottell the truth, but instead provided misinformation to my local newspaper. Ipublicly rebutted their claims [F2] and expected to receive a legal summonsas R. Christopher Barden, attorney for the FMSF, promised me in 1998 [F3],or I expected to be killed due to the fact that Michelle Devereaux told methat a group of people pursuing my identity wished to injure me, or worse.Instead, I found myself the target of psychotronic technology and I havesuffered tremendously from the unique usage of it.
It is clear that the main motive of these people was to retaliate against mefor exposing their network on my web pages, but I also believe they haddiscovered that several therapists and I had planned to report their networkto the FBI to investigate for possible criminal conduct. However, the painand suffering I have experienced during the past two years has been ofsufficient intensity and duration to divert attention from this goal – untilrecently. Fortunately this particular network left a paper trail in theirpursuit of me.
Some of the people I was following over the past several years are:
Lt. Col. Michael Aquino, cult leader of a satanic organization called theTemple of Set. He was a High Priest while simultaneously serving in thearmed forces as a military intelligence operative andpsychological/propaganda warfare expert. Lt. Col. Aquino was processed outof the Army Active Reserves in 1990 after a ritual child molestationinvestigation. Peter and Pamela Freyd, founders of the False memory Syndrome Foundation(FMSF).
John M. Price, Ph.D., co-moderator of the newsgroupSci.psychology.psychotherapy.moderated – affiliated with University ofCalifornia (UC)- Davis.
Ralph Underwager, Ex-advisory Board Member of the FMSF, who claimedpedophilia was “God’s will” in the journal Paidika. See:http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/NudistHallofShame/Underwager2.html
Phil Shaver, Ph.D., from UC Davis, co-wrote a research study, which I wasquestioning, entitled “Characteristics of Ritual Abuse Allegations”.
Leslie E. Packer, Ph.D., a self-described “child advocate and TourettesSyndrome Specialist” from the New York area.
John Singleton, aka “Raven”, wrote in the newsgroup,Sci.psychology.psychotherapy.
Nancy Alvarado, Ph.D., affiliated with UC San Diego.
John Clark, affiliated with UC San Diego.
R. Christopher Barden, JD, Ph.D., lawyer and psychologist who works with theFMSF and threatened to sue me in 1998 when we were both covering a FederalTrial from opposite perspectives.
Roby Roberson, alleged perpetrator, Wenatchee Sex Ring Case.
Carol Hopkins and Mark Sauer, from San Diego. Ms. Hopkins was DeputyForeperson for, and co-authored, the 1991-1992 San Diego Grand Jury ReportNo. 8, “Child Sexual Abuse, Assault, and Molest Issues”. She defendedalleged perpetrators in the Wenatchee Sex Ring Case and in Cuernevaca,Mexico. Mark Sauer is a reporter for the San Diego Union-Tribune.
Elizabeth Loftus; Ph.D., memory researcher and FMSF Advisory Board member.She defended alleged perpetrators in the Wenatchee Sex Ring Case.
Lorne D. Gilsig, ex-LAPD officer and colleague of Lt. Col. Michael Aquino.
David Pierce, computer expert from Austin, Texas, possibly working with SETIprograms.
Gary Schons, Attorney General Representative, San Diego, and legal counselfor the 1991-1992 San Diego Grand Jury Report No. 8, “Child Sexual Abuse,Assault, and Molest Issues”. David G. Hall, reportedly a physicist internaffiliated with UC Irvine.
Ron Locklin, a computer programmer, reportedly working with SETI programs,is an ex-employee of Livermore Lab.
Scott Locklin, aka Lupo Le Boucher, satanist, physics major, computerexpert, possibly working with SETI programs, reported ex-employee of theNational Security Agency [NSA], and affiliated with UC Davis aftergraduating from University of Pennsylvania.
Jeanette Runyan, from the Order of Astarte.
Tanya Lysenko, aka Tani Jantsang, satanist who publicly stated I should bedismembered after my identity was discovered, and reportedly has an uncle inthe KGB in Russia.
Kevin Filan is from the Church of Satan.
Zeena LaVey, lives and works with Michael Aquino.
Michelle Devereaux, satanist, computer expert, and co- moderator of theWITCHHUNT EGROUPS LIST.
More Details About Some Individuals Involved in This NetworkMy interaction with R. Christopher Barden, JD, PHD, began in 1998 after heplayed the role of legal analyst on the FMSF’s web sitehttp://www.fmsfonline.org during the Federal Trial against Judith Petersonand several other therapists in Houston, Texas in 1998. I constructed a webpage dedicated to providing a defense for them because the indictment read,in part, that diagnosing Dissociate Identity Disorder [DID] and sending theinsurance claim through the mail constituted “mail fraud” and thatacknowledging that clients were self-disclosed victims of Satanic RitualAbuse [SRA] constituted unprofessional conduct since SRA “did not exist”. I responded by collecting and publicizing my archive of 65 SRA cases fromaround the world and I became active, promoting my web site, attempting tooffer a balance to the FMSF’s skewed coverage. This Federal case ultimatelyresulted in a mistrial and the prosecutor refused to refile the charges.
While covering this case, Dr. Christopher Barden threatened to sue me if Idid not retract claims that he “promoted pseudoscience and provided legaldefenses for the FMSF”. I responded to this frivolous threat by constructinga web page highlighting the absurdity of his complaint.
After examining Dr. Barden’s malpractice claims against therapists, itbecame clear that all of the allegations were remarkably similar and itbegan to look like a concerted effort to target therapists frivolously, butdevastatingly, destroying their reputations and careers by making cookiecutter legal and licensing board complaints. It also became clear that Dr.Elizabeth Loftus and the other Advisory Board members of the FMSF were notaddressing a conspiracy of inept therapists attending the same“unprofessional” conferences, from whom the public needed protection.Instead, the FMSF appeared to actively canvas for recanting victims of SRA,who, in turn, accused their therapists of implanting “false memories,”resulting in astronomical insurance settlements divided by all. So-called“recantors” have their own newsletter and, they too, are quite organized.
As of 1998, Dr. Christopher Barden described participating in “22 or 23similar cases” in a news article discussing a recent and unusual court loss.[F4] Dr. Elizabeth Loftus described reviewing another 50 or 80 cases thatwere to be filed. The FMSF newsletter published online regularly reports onthe outcome of these cases as well as the outcome of licensing boardcomplaints in their “Legal Corner” section.
The sad reality is that the FMSF, and the cults they appear to support,staged a war and the therapeutic community did not know what hit them untilit was too late. Due to these events, several therapists and I decided toreport what we suspected was a criminal network encompassing cult groups,child abuse, insurance fraud and the cover-up which included investigatingagencies, and Grand Juries. Before I could report my particular concerns tothe FBI, I was stalked in San Diego by a cult member by the name of MichelleDevereaux, terrorized by her friend, William Scherk, and then later,targeted with the technology which will be described at the end of thispaper. The trail of stalking was both initiated and substantiated for lawenforcement by Michelle Devereaux, who attempted to flush out my identity byphoning law enforcement, claiming I was in danger from a network ofindividuals. Apparently she was hoping I would give my real name to lawenforcement and then the cult would retrieve my real name from them aftershe changed tactics and began making false claims about me. This ruseactually did work for them in my case. [F5]
As a side note, in another example of a cult technique from California, analleged cult member (CM) was attempting to give testimony to law enforcementabout the Jon Benet Ramsey case. CM’s relatives reported her as missing tothe local police department, then that Dept., in turn, traced her to theBoulder Police for her relatives, apparently not understanding that CM wasin the process of disclosing information about the criminal network that herfamily was involved in and therefore wanted her location kept private. Theseare two examples of sophisticated cult tactics, proving that naivelaw-enforcement can be easily manipulated by them.
Other tactics include breaking into therapists’ homes or offices and movingobjects around, commonly referred to as “gaslighting” or an attempt to makeone’s victim feel “crazy.” Another technique is for the perpetrator toimmediately stage an aggressive offense and accuse all investigatingofficials of incompetence or malfeasance, after which an expensive lawsuitmight cause an agency to hesitate about investigating similar claims. Thesetactics are used nationwide and case law around the country reflect them aswell as other techniques which are used. Another way for perpetrators todeflect others from their own agenda is to accuse others of what theythemselves are doing. For instance, accusing therapists of implanting “falsememories” can be a reversal of intentional mind control that perpetratorsimplement to cover up their crimes, commonly referred to as screen memories.If one evaluates the FMSF online web site from this perspective, it makesquite an interesting read. In my opinion, the Wenatchee Sex Ring defendantsused some of the above tactics. I constructed a web-page on this casehighlighting several red-flag issues that raised serious questions abouttheir innocence.
The other area of concern is that the FMSF, in many court cases involvingclaims of repressed memory, files Amicus Briefs to the Appellate courts inan effort to have the court remand the case back to the local court level.The authors of these Briefs state that “repressed memory” is not accepted bythe “majority of the scientific community.” This is a blatantly falsestatement, nevertheless it indicates that a small minority of “scientists”can get away with speaking for the majority by the usage of bothsophisticated and simple propaganda techniques.
An example of a sophisticated technique would be the rigging of anexperimental study and the manipulation of the experimental subjects. Anexample of a simple technique would be an FMSF Advisory Board member lyingabout the number of research studies proving Traumatic Amnesia and Repressedmemory. There are several examples available proving the above statements[F6]. The media outlets describing these issues report the particular biasof the editorial staff, or newspapers, in particular, copy other newsoutlets. If a piece of misinformation is reported in one article, that samemisinformation will be repeated in all articles. This state of affairs is awell known phenomenon among propaganda specialists or those purposelyattempting to cover up their activities. [F7] At the point in time when theperpetrators are misinforming the public, staging publicity stunts ordemonstrations in attempts to correct the travesty of justice might beadvised.
Carol Hopkins and Mark SauerDuring 1998, I constructed several web sites, one of which was devoted topublicizing the cover-up of ritual abuse in San Diego County, which I heldCarol Hopkins and reporter Mark Sauer responsible for. In 1991-1992, Ms. Hopkins co-authored a Grand Jury Report and critiquedseveral cases from the District Attorney office and Child ProtectionServices. She quoted the opinions of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation inthis report four months after its inception and argued for the dismantlingof the standing ritual abuse protocol at CPS. It became clear that severalyears afterwards that the FMSF was actually a political group devoted todenying the existence of these crimes using confabulation and intimidationas their principle modus operandi.
In 1992-1993, another Grand Jury was convened and they discovered that Ms.Hopkins’ rendition of cases was incorrect. The 1992-1993 Report, entitled,“Protect the Child, Preserve the Family Report”, provided accurate caseinformation and concluded that the previous report had caused needless harmto many involved in the offices of the District Attorney and CPS. It wasalso discovered that Ms. Hopkins had an affair with Attorney GeneralRepresentative Gary Schons after it was decided that the District Attorneycould not represent the 1991-1992 Grand Jury due to a conflict of interest.Schons and Hopkins maintain their affair began after their Grand Jury’s workwas concluded; however I find that claim highly doubtful. [F8] Over theyears, Mr. Schons has continued to be quoted in the San Diego Union-Tribunerepeating FMSF propaganda.
Carol Hopkins then formed a group called the Justice Committee and shetestified in Sacramento, California, in hearings discussing the merit of thesocial work immunity laws. These would make individual CPS social workersliable in case any irate parent chose to sue instead of holding theDepartment of Social Services accountable, which had previously been thecase. This law did pass and it created even more of a climate ofintimidation when investigating volatile and politically- incorrect forms ofchild abuse, such as ritual abuse or multi- offender cases involving sexrings.
In approximately 1993, after Carol Hopkins’ Grand Jury report and subsequentnegative publicity in the local newspapers, the San Diego Union-Tribune,(courtesy of her friend, Mark Sauer), social workers, and supervisors, weretold ritual abuse cases were virtually non-existent and statistics on sexualmolestation were grossly inflated. I continued to handle one or two morecases with cult allegations after this time when concerned supervisorsspecifically gave me these cases to investigate after they attended one ofthese mandated meetings when required to by Director of CPS, Ivory Johnson.At that time, Carol Hopkins was considered instrumental in the election ofthe then-new District Attorney, Paul Pfingst. Afterwards, I was told she wasthen on a special committee reviewing criminal cases for a short time.
As of September, 2002, Paul Pfingst was still claiming there was no evidenceto prove ritual abuse existed. He was publically quoted by reporter MarkSauer as stating two workshops regarding ritual abuse, hosted by an annualinternational conference on family violence, should not be offered to thepublic. Pfingst said; “This theory [ritual abuse] was completely debunked inthe early ’90s”. Sauer wrote; “District Attorney Paul Pfingst expressedgrave concerns that a widely attended and influential conference wouldfeature workshops on ritual abuse, since he has seen no evidence that suchcases exists”. And Pfingst threatened; “If someone wants to go back toteaching that satanic ritual abuse claptrap, we’re going to have a seriousdiscussion about whether law enforcement in San Diego should respond andexpose it for what it is.” Ms. Hopkins also wrote a formal complaint to theSan Diego Grand Jury in an attempt to intimidate the organizationssponsoring the conference. Members of the San Diego Grand Jury attendedthese workshops to investigate.
Further research revealed that in 1996 Carol Hopkins had a teenage witnessin her custody during the high-profile child molestation case evidencingmultiple offenders in Wenatchee, Washington. It was disclosed in a newsarticle written by Mark Sauer, that CPS director Ivory Johnson personallysupervised this placement, which Carol Hopkins again confirmed on theWITCHHUNT E-groups list in the year 2000. Many of the Wenatchee childwitnesses and confessed perpetrators eventually recanted and all of themwere ultimately released after the successful appeal of their case. Havingthe Director of Social Services, Ivory Johnson, personally supervise thisplacement was highly unusual, if not unethical, as there were rumors thatHopkins and Johnson were friends. In addition, favorable articles for Ms.Hopkins, against the reality of ritual abuse, were authored by Mark Sauerover several years time.
In 1998 I was contacted by a local citizen in Cuernevaca, Mexico, who hadread my web pages about Carol Hopkins. She was concerned because of Ms.Hopkins’ position defending a child molestation case in that town. Severalpeople were threatened and they decided to write an article disclosing Ms.Hopkin’s background which would be written using information gathered frommy web page, including the web site address for reference purposes.
All of my web pages were eventually taken down because Michelle Devereauxmade complaints to the owners of the web sites I was using. She then beganfollowing me in San Diego County and later made false claims to campuspolice at the school site I was visiting when accessing the internet inorder to formally identify me. Ms. Devereaux can be found on the internetunder various pseudonyms, such as “Lurker” and “cyberforensics”. She createda web page and took all of the documentation I had on my web site about cultcrime, making it appear as if this work were her own.
In the year 1999 I had contacted Gail Goodman Ph.D. from UC Davis. She, PhilShaver Ph.D. and Bette Bottoms authored a research study entitled“Characteristics of Ritual Abuse Allegations”. I requested the underlyingdata as well as the surveys which were used to form the conclusions theirreport was based on. I along with another researcher wanted to challengethis study because based on my years at CPS and with the legal communityattempting to argue for the collection of statistics on ritual abuse cases,I found the statistical analysis within the body of their report to behighly suspect.
Dr’s JOHN PRICE, LESLIE PACKER, BILL GOODRICH, NANCY ALVARADO, JOHN CLARK,and JOHN SINGLETONJohn M. Price Ph.D., attended school at UC Davis, majoring in psychology andalso claimed at one time to be a faculty member there. He was a co-moderatorof the internet newsgoup sci.psychology.psychotherapy in 1996 when Idiscovered him. He came to my attention because of his unusual views aboutchild molestation. It eventually became clear in my opinion that a smallgroup of people including Nancy Alvarado, Ph.D., Leslie Packer, Ph.D., BillGoodrich, MFT, John Clark, and John Singleton, using the pseudonym of“Raven” were all staged there attempting to skew public opinion about childmolestation without using any of the usual, subtle social persuasiontechniques commonly used by social science interest groups as described byMargaret Singer in her book, “Cults in Our Midst”. After a few months of reading this newsgroup, a man by the name of Lorne D.Gilsig, an LAPD officer, began interacting with everyone. He mocked victims,compared ritual abuse claims to stories about “Albino alligators and organstealing”, then began sending me harassing e-mail for 6 months. Shortlyafterward, Lt. Co. Michael Aquino acknowledged knowing Lorne Gilsig. I sentseveral of Mr. Gilsig’s outrageous claims to the LAPD along with a copy ofAquino’s public court papers and suggested that they might want to watch Mr.Gilsig’s activity.
In retrospect, it became clear that this particular “science group” wasawaiting publication of a research study titled “A meta-analytic examinationof assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples”, (Rind,B., Tromovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998)., Psychological Bulletin, 124,22-53). One of the authors of this paper was traced to the political writingof NAMBLA- North American Man-Boy Love Association. Some members of NAMBLAare extremely dangerous. (See Curleys vs. NAMBLA- a lawsuit filed by twoparents who sued NAMBLA after the sexual molestation and murder of theirson). It is my opinion that this group to varying degrees was clearlyattempting to normalize pedophilia via the Rind study along with the authorswho succeeded in having their work published in the APA’s mainstreamjournal.
I was viciously verbally attacked by members of this newsgroupsci.psychology.psychotherapy, after questioning their agenda, then Idiscovered Dr. Leslie E. Packer and John Price were working with Lt. Co.Michael Aquino and others in an attempt to track my identity, which theyfinally did.
Dr. Laura Schlesinger, a radio talk show host in Los Angeles, beganpublicizing the Rind study along with a series of damning critiques. Dr.Nancy Alvarado and John Price then began writing in Dr. Laura’s news group,along with an aggressive group of unknown others, who began calling forprotests after viciously attacking her.
Reportedly, John Price was asked to leave UC Davis after controversialmaterial was found on his computer.
Scott LocklinScott Locklin is a Satanist, physics student, computer expert/hacker andreported ex-NSA employee. I had a long-standing e-mail relationship with hima few years ago at which time he gave me advice about anonymity. He e-mailedme once from a National Security Agency office [NSA], telling me it was asecure e-mail system and they would be the only people reading my e- mail.Scott Locklin led me to believe he was working undercover while postinginformation to the newsgroup alt.satanism and writing under the pseudonym ofLupo Le Boucher. He ultimately betrayed my confidence and I consider Mr.Locklin to be quite dangerous and I hold him personally accountable for theway in which I was targeted. It appears Scott Locklin claimed that he graduated from the University ofPennsylvania- home base of the FMSF- then transferred to UC-Davis where hewas working on a project involving Experimental Atomic Particle Physics, andlater, Fifth Dimensional and Plasma Physics, with a group of others in theUC system and elsewhere. He was also reportedly interning at LawrenceLivermore Laboratory. I’m told Scott Locklin sold his software and hardwareto a very wealthy Jewish couple from Los Angeles, California, that includesthe latest in virtual reality, NSA tracking software, and more. Thisparticular Jewish couple are known for their interest in Sci-Fi-liketechnology and their company specializes in unique special effects software.This couple also has a reputation for being humanitarians, having funded aproject that documented the testimony of Holocaust survivors many years ago.But unfortunately in their zeal to play God and destroy what they did notunderstand, they, along with a few of their friends, are guilty of a numberof travesties. When confronted, they responded with an aggressivecounter-play, consisting of misinformation and absurd claims to the courtsystem and to the media which other media outlets repeated.
Kevin Filan was a member of the Church of Satan in 1997. During that time,he challenged the validity of Lt. Col. Aquino’s lawsuit against my internetcompany and hosted volatile documents on his web page, which was a publicservice, but a dangerous action to take. I publicly thanked Mr. Filan, but Inow know that thank-you was premature due to later events in which heparticipated.
Lt. Col. Michael AquinoIn 1996 I accessed internal documents from Lt. Col. Michael Aquino’s legalcase Aquino vs. Stone 957 F.2d 139 in which he was Titled as a suspect in aritual child molestation case. Unfortunately the Criminal InvestigativeDivision [CID] of the Army released their report several months after thestatute of limitation ran. Lt. Col. Aquino contested the Titling Action, butthe Appellate court ruled in the Army’s favor which resulted in his processout of the Army in 1990. It appears that Lt. Col. Aquino was forced from theActive to the Inactive Reserves, but according to documents Aquino attachedto the case Aquino vs. Electriciti, Case #984751, located in San Francisco,CA, he served several days out of the year at US SPACE COMMAND until 1993,after which he reportedly “voluntarily retired.” The Army case against Lt. Col. Aquino involved multiple children in severaljurisdictions: The Presidio Army Base itself, Sonoma and Mendocino Counties,and the town of Ukiah, all communities which are located in NorthernCalifornia. Apparently a child was questioned in Washington, D.C. as well.Many of these children reported electroshock, submersion in water,kidnapping, being bled, and victimization within satanic sexual ritualrites. There were questions raised as to if Lt. Col. Aquino was guilty,whether he was simply following the dictates of his own religious system(Satan worship), or whether he was conducting a clandestine mind controlexperiment involving these particular children.
There are dozens of individuals who have come forward over the yearsclaiming victimization by him and several who have reported his unusualinterests. It is possible now to project Virtual Reality Scenarios to avictim from a distant location via computer tracking and nanotechnology, asdocumented in the lawsuit Akwei vs. NSA and elsewhere. Some of thistechnology appears Orwellian, at the very least.
Approximately 25 years ago Lt. Col. Michael Aquino initiated a ritual in anSS castle in Wellwersburg, Germany, where he claimed to have brought in the“forces of darkness” at that specific site. The location was known to be aseat of much suffering where the SS hierarchy of the Nazi Party was rumoredto have participated in Satanic rites. Curiously, Aquino has alternatelyclaimed and denied at various times to be the son of a Nazi officer fromHitler’s Regime; [F9] in Newsweek Magazine he has claimed to be theAnti-Christ and the Second Beast of Revelation. [F10] This may explain hisinterest in Armageddon scenarios and points to activity that is much moredevastating than anyone had previously thought.
After exposing the documentation detailing the demise of Lt. Col. Aquino’sformal military career, he traced me to my internet company, Electriciti,and sued them in an effort to discover my identity. In 1997 the Courtdismissed his lawsuit and the owners of Electriciti reportedly refused tosearch for my real name for him, as I signed up with a pseudonym.Christopher Alan, President of Electriciti, gave several newspaperinterviews, stating he would never disclose my real name to Lt. Col. Aquino,even if he did know it, because he would never be able to live with theconsequences of his actions afterwards if any harm came to me, given Lt.Col. Aquino’s satanic cult leadership status. However my identity waspublicly disclosed in the San Diego Union-Tribune in the year 2000 by MarkSauer and afterwards I believe Aquino and others came after me with avengeance, using the latest high tech equipment available to him.
For further information about Lt. Col. Aquino, I refer the reader to thebooks: “Why Johnny Can’t Come Home”, by Noreen Gosch (2000); “The NewSatanists”, by Linda Blood (1994); and “The Franklin Cover-up”, by JohnDeCamp (1992).
Psychotronics, Electronic Harassment, Mind Control and Mental Illness>From John St. Clair Akwei vs. NSA [National Security Agency], Ft. Meade, MD,USA p. 4:“A subject’s bioelectric field can be remotely detected, so subjects can bemonitored anywhere they are. With special EMF equipment NSA cryptologistscan remotely read evoked potentials (from EEGs). These can be decoded into aperson’s brain-states and thoughts. The subject is then perfectly monitoredfrom a distance.
NSA personnel can dial up any individual in the country on the Signalslntelligence EMF scanning network and the NSA’s computers will then pinpointand track that person 24 hours-a-day. The NSA can pick out and track anyonein the U.S.
Later on p. 4
For electronic surveillance purposes electrical activity in the speechcenter of the brain can be translated into the subject’s verbal thoughts.RNM can send encoded signals to the brain’s auditory cortex thus allowingaudio communication direct to the brain (bypassing the ears). NSA operativescan use this to covertly debilitate subjects by simulating auditoryhallucinations characteristic of paranoid schizophrenia.
Without any contact with the subject, Remote Neural Monitoring can map outelectrical activity from the visual cortex of a subject’s brain and showimages from the subject’s brain on a video monitor. NSA operatives see whatthe surveillance subject’s eyes are seeing. Visual memory can also be seen.RNM can send images direct to the visual cortex. bypassing the eyes andoptic nerves. NSA operatives can use this to surreptitiously put images in asurveillance subject’s brain while they are in R.E.M. sleep for brain-programming purposes.” [emphasis added].
Page 3.
“NSA personnel can control the lives of hundreds of thousands of individualsin the U.S. by using the NSA’s domestic intelligence network and coverbusinesses. The operations independently run by them can sometimes go beyondthe bounds of law. Long-term control and sabotage of tens of thousands ofunwitting citizens by NSA operatives is likely to happen. NSA Domint has theability to covertly assassinate U.S. citizens or run covert psychologicalcontrol operations to cause subjects to be diagnosed with ill mentalhealth.”
As clearly stated, the technology just described has not only the ability tomimic the symptoms of mental illness, but the degree of dysfunction can bedirectly attributed to the malice of the individual user accessing thecomputer and the relative coping skills of the target. Until thisinformation is acknowledged and understood, people will continue to be mis-diagnosed according to the current criteria used in the American PsychiatricAssociation’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM). In addition, abonafide brief or prolonged mental illness can occur after exposure to thistechnology. The ongoing trauma itself could lead to a psychologicaldisorder. The sources of funding for some illicit mind control experiments have beentraced to the CIA, proven by the public exposure of Canada’s Dr. EwenCameron, by Dr. Harvey Weinstein and Dr. Colin Ross. [F11] These funds arethen diverted to major research institutions which design illegalexperimentation on sub-populations, which was documented in Ross’ work. Theresearch committees that implement changes in the DSM are faculty members ofthese institutions and if one reads the signs and symptoms of mental illnessin the 1970s, one can see they mimic symptoms of mind control research.
Reportedly others were involved field-testing their private researchprojects from various institutions rumored to be funded by the military orCIA such as Carnegie Mellon, John Hopkins University, and select schoolsfrom the California UC system.
Another group reportedly involved in these research projects is a UFOresearch group called the Aviary. The Aviary includes several militarypersonnel among their membership. Allegedly, one gentleman involved is aCol. John Alexander who is interested in studies involving the process ofDeath and Dying. [F12]
As of today, it is possible to remotely assault a person, by the usage oftechnology developed by the NSA. That means it is possible to design mindcontrol programs and implement them from a distance, and torture someonefrom a distance, depending on the creativity and agenda of the perpetrator.However, there may or may not be any medical documentation to prove theexistence of any of this activity for some time.
The new sophisticated mind control programs are implemented in the innereyelid so that when the victim closes his or her eyes, one sees a computerscreen on which any image can be projected. I’m told that these developmentsare a product of Nanotechnology.
In addition, according to an article in the Daily Telegraph, dated July 18,1996, titled, “Scientists offer the ‘end of death’; ‘Soul Catcher’ computerchip implanted behind the eye”; “… A computer chip implanted behind theeye that could record a person’s every lifetime thought and sensation is tobe developed by British scientists…he predicted that within three decades,it would be possible to relive other people’s lives by playing back theirexperiences on a computer. By combining this information with a record ofthe person’s genes, we could recreate a person, physically, emotionally, andspiritually…” BTs’ Martlesham Health Laboratories near Ipswich, England,is the private company quoted in this article.
They cite the ability and intent to implant computer chips into people as of1996 in the optic nerve. In lawsuit Akwei vs. NSA, filed in the early1990’s, there is reference to the NSA’s ability to “see what thesurveillance eyes are seeing” after they are monitored from a distance.Oftentimes, private companies are sold the clandestine research ofgovernment organizations and this is what appears to have occurred.
If members of the public are being used to field test the research ofprivate companies against their will, they would be in great jeopardy, notonly physically, but psychologically, because they would not readily bebelieved when trying to disclose their distress. Obviously, psychotropicmedication is not going to be helpful in these instances.
The combination of this technology along with the long-term agendas ofresearch facilities such as Ames Lab, Los Alamos Laboratory, LawrenceLivermore Lab, and other research facilities, is cause for great alarm. Dr.Nick Begich writes, in “Angels Don’t Play This HAARP: Advances in TeslaTechnology” (by Dr. Nick Begich and Jeanne Manning), p. 148, discussingelectronic research:
“The Soviets went on to discover that by slight manipulation- by reversingbrain polarity (by passing very low voltage current through the front of thebrain to the back)- they could endure deep sleep. Mounting evidence alsoindicated that they may have perfected ‘telepathic hypnosis’ which could bedeployed from hundreds of miles away from the target person.”Colonel John Alexander expresses interest in this area as well. [F12]According to the writer, Armen Victorian, Alexander is on the board of a“remote-viewing” company called PSI-TECH, which also employs a “formermicrowave scientist”. Lt. Col. Aquino also wrote a paper, published in the Military Review, atleast 20 years ago called “From PSYOP to Mind War: The Psychology ofVictory”. The entire paper is photocopied in Milton Cooper’s book; “Behold aPale Horse”, p. 369. In this paper, Lt. Col Aquino argues in favor of theusage of psychotronics on individuals in his response to Col. JohnAlexander’s article in the same journal:
“There are some purely natural conditions under which minds may become moreor less receptive to ideas, and Mindwar should take full advantage of suchphenomenon as atmospheric electromagnetic activity, air ionization, andextremely low frequency waves.”According to Dr. Nick Begich, extremely low frequency [ELF] waves, alsocalled “microwaves”, are detrimental to human health. There have also been questions raised among investigators about whatactivity could be hidden behind “screen memories” and if an other agendalurked behind some instances of alleged ritual abuse or “UFO abductions”that was more horrifying than, or what was in addition to, the scenariosdepicted. I believe “screen memories” may be designed to hide experimentswith computer-brain interface, which in combination with the destruction ofbio- energetic fields is tantamount to spiritual murder and is a completeabomination.
I was told that there were attempts by some to impact the bioenergeticfields around the human body and interior to the body and that the utterdestruction of these fields results, ultimately, in complete technologicalpossession. The lawsuit Akwei vs. NSA refers to the ability of the NSA toimpact bioenergetic fields, but various cult organizations have otheragendas which include unique abuses personal to their own religiouspersuasion such as destroying the Chakra system and the actual astral bodyof the target.
This technology is now being directed at political targets. See this webpage for information about psychotronics and the Chakra system [13] and thediscussion of both at a conference about non-lethal warfare.
Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) introduced a bill in the House ofRepresentatives in late 2001 that would ban weapons in space. Among theweapons that it would proscribe the new measure includes “psychotronic”devices that are “directed at individual persons or targeted populations forthe purpose of … mood management, or mind control.” The bill is publishedin full on the internet. [F14] The Kucinich bill was hailed by CitizensAgainst Human Rights Abuse (CAHRA), one of a number of organizations ofpeople who say they are victims of government experimentation involvingelectromagnetic and other psychotronic weapons. CAHRA has a web site [F15]and a page listing symptoms in people targeted by such weaponry. [F16]
More web sites on electronic harassment include:
http://www.siin.com/elec.htmlhttp://www.projectfreedom.cng1.com/classic_mind_control.htmlhttp://www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/mind_control/theclassicmind170326.htmlhttp://www.raven1.net/glossary.htmhttp://www.controlledamerica.itgo.com/contact.htmlhttp://www.controlledamerica.com/index.php?subPage=introhttp://www.stopcovertwar.com/target.htmlhttp://home.earthlink.net/~alanyu76/microwave2.htmpro-freedom.co.uk/part_1.htmlhttp://www.rob-profile.com/http://home.swipnet.se/allez/Local/4/mk_master.htmlhttp://home.swipnet.se/allez/Eng/ImplvsMW.htmhttp://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg47260.htmlhttp://educate-yourself.org/mc/mccurrentmcinamerica10mar01.shtmlhttp://www.bugsweeps.com/info/microwave.html [F17]
There is a saying by someone trying to explain how an entire country couldhave turned a blind eye when the Nazi Germans cremated millions of citizensfrom their own and neighboring countries. Loosely translated, it reads:
“When they came for the shop owner down the street, I turned my head cause Icould not be bothered; when they came for my neighbor, I looked the otherway so they would not see me; when they finally came for me, there wasnobody left to resist.”Millions of people were exterminated in Germany in complicity with a passivepublic and the paid propagandists of the state stating the extreme claimswere not true. Organizations like the False Memory Syndrome Foundation andothers will continue to cover up for, and deny, the existence of Sataniccults, an excellent sub-population to experiment on without having concernabout the disclosures of these children. This is due to these families’ andcollateral networks’ ability to cover up crimes as well as the ability toshut down investigations in the large community, as was documented to haveoccurred in San Diego County. I believe it is important for a Federal GrandJury to investigate the FMSF as soon as possible. Notes1. San Diego County Grand Jury, Report No. 8, “Child Sexual Abuse, Assault,and Molest Issues”, June 29, 1992, and later report, No. 13, “Protect theChild, Preserve the Family” dated June 29, 1993. 2. See Response by “Karen Curio Jones” to Mark Sauer’s article, “A Web ofIntrigue” dated January 1, 2001, located on various newsgroups, also(http://truthbeknown2000.tripod.com/Truthbeknown2000/id4.html)
3. Correspondence between Dr. Christopher Barden and Karen Jones (mypseudonym) was posted on the internet newsgroups in 1998.
4. See “Jurors Believe Therapists”, The (NC) Charlotte Observer, August 20,1998.
5. SDSU Incident Report, June 13, 2000, posted on January 12, 2001, at04:52:07 PST on newsgroup alt.Satanism.
6. Crook, L.S., & Dean, M. (1999). “Lost in a shopping mall”–A breach ofprofessional ethics. Ethics & Behavior, 9(1), 39-50 and Crook, L.S., & Dean,M. (1999). Logical fallacies and ethical breaches. Ethics & Behavior, 9(1),61-68.
7. See Cults in Our Midst, by Margaret Thaler Singer, Janja Lalich, RobertJay Lifton (1996) Josey Bass, and Memory, Trauma Treatment, and the Law, byDaniel P. Brown, Alan W. Scheflin, D. Corydon Hammond (1998) Norton.
8. Gary Schons, Assistant Attorney General in San Diego, is known in SanDiego for debunking repressed memory as “Voodoo Science”, according to MarkSauer of the San Diego Union-Tribune. Search newspaper for key words.
9. See Linda Blood, “The New Satanists”, Times-Warner, 1994.
10. “The Second Beast of Revelation, Claims of Satanism And ChildMolesting”, Newsweek, November 16, 1987.
11. Bluebird : Deliberate Creation of Multiple Personality by Psychiatrists,by Colin A. Ross (2000) Manitou. Dr. Ross documented the money trail ofillicit mind control experiments and other activity to major academicinstitutions.
12. Alexander, Lieutenant Colonel John B., “The New Mental Battlefield: BeamMe Up Spock” in Military Review, Vol. LX, No. 12, December, 1980, and seehttp://www.mindcontrolforums.com/hambone/people.htmlhttp://www.newsmakingnews.com/alexandedatadump.htm
13. See http://www.ufonet.it/archivio/government-psi.htm , a web-pagepublicizing military conference on the chakras, “non- lethal” weaponry, andconcern about an impending eschatological event.
14. See: http://www.fas.org/sgp/congress/2001/hr2977.html
15. See: http://mindjustice.org/,
16. See: http://mindjustice.org/symptoms.htm
17. “Microwave Detection: Remote Mind Control Technology”, by Anna Keeler,states that Los Alamos National Laboratory is now under the supervision ofUniversity of California (p. 8).
I declare under penalty of perjury and the laws of the State of Californiathat the foregoing is true correct.
_____________________ ________ August 29, 2003
Name Signature Date
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that I am, and at all
times hereinafter mentioned was, more than 18 years of age, a
citizen of the United States and a [ ] resident of [X] employed
in the County of San Diego. I am not a party to this action. My
[X] business [ ] residence address is 3633 Camino del Rio South,
Suite 301, San Diego, CA 92108.
On August 30, 2003, I served the following documents:
DECLARATION OF DIANA NAPOLIS IN RESPONSE TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS
OF THE BOARD OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE on the below-listed parties by
placing true copies thereof in a sealed envelope addressed as
follows:
Office of the District Attorney
Feona Khalil, Deputy District Attorney
330 West Broadway, Suite 1300
San Diego, CA 92101-3826
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California
James M. Ledakis, Deputy Attorney General
110 West A Street, Ste. 1100
San Diego, CA 92101
http://www.raven1.net/napolis1.htm
I deposited said envelope in the United States mail, first
class postage prepaid, at San Diego, California.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date: August 30, 2003
______________________________
Received 09-03-2003
Dr. Leslie Packer, Usenet & Internet Child Pedophile Rings (Repost), Oopsie DoodleRe: Michael Aquino, Usenet & Internet Child Pedophile Rings, Oopsie DoodleRe: Michael Aquino, Usenet & Internet Child Pedophile Rings, ThePsykoRe: Michael Aquino, Usenet & Internet Child Pedophile Rings, Oscar Russell of Dallas, TX is a drug dealing scumbagRe: Dr. Leslie Packer, Usenet & Internet Child Pedophile Rings (Repost), Oopsie DoodleRe: Dr. Leslie Packer, Usenet & Internet Child Pedophile Rings (Repost), Kali‘Kimberly Barnard” is Michelle Devereaux Re: Dr. Leslie Packer, Usenet & Internet Child Pedophile Rings (Repost), Oopsie DoodleRe: ‘Kimberly Barnard” is Michelle Devereaux Re: Dr. Leslie Packer, Usenet & Internet Child Pedophile Rings (Repost), Oopsie DoodleRe: Dr. Leslie Packer, Usenet & Internet Child Pedophile Rings (Repost), Oopsie DoodleRe: Dr. Leslie Packer, Usenet & Internet Child Pedophile Rings (Repost), Oopsie DoodleRe: Dr. Leslie Packer, Usenet & Internet Child Pedophile Rings (Repost), Dr. Flonkenstein
Comments