June 10, 2015 - The Constantine Report    
Image
March 5th 2020 12

Are you using the best credit card when ordering food for delivery?

The key to more success is to have a lot of pillows. Always remember in the jungle there’s a lot of they in there, after you will make it to paradise. Egg whites, turkey sausage, wheat toast, water.

Continue reading
Image
March 5th 2020 12

Are you using the best credit card when ordering food for delivery?

The key to more success is to have a lot of pillows. Always remember in the jungle there’s a lot of they in there, after you will make it to paradise. Egg whites, turkey sausage, wheat toast, water.

Continue reading
Image
March 5th 2020 12

Are you using the best credit card when ordering food for delivery?

The key to more success is to have a lot of pillows. Always remember in the jungle there’s a lot of they in there, after you will make it to paradise. Egg whites, turkey sausage, wheat toast, water.

Continue reading
Image
March 5th 2020 12

Are you using the best credit card when ordering food for delivery?

The key to more success is to have a lot of pillows. Always remember in the jungle there’s a lot of they in there, after you will make it to paradise. Egg whites, turkey sausage, wheat toast, water.

Continue reading
Image
March 5th 2020 12

Are you using the best credit card when ordering food for delivery?

The key to more success is to have a lot of pillows. Always remember in the jungle there’s a lot of they in there, after you will make it to paradise. Egg whites, turkey sausage, wheat toast, water.

Continue reading
Image
March 5th 2020 12

Are you using the best credit card when ordering food for delivery?

The key to more success is to have a lot of pillows. Always remember in the jungle there’s a lot of they in there, after you will make it to paradise. Egg whites, turkey sausage, wheat toast, water.

Continue reading

Meet White Supremacist Texas GOP Appeals Judge from Hell Edith Jones

This is a modified py-6 that occupies the entire horizontal space of its parent.

She’s not at all my cup of tea (party). Fifth-Circuit Texas Appeals Court Judge Edith Jones is a far-right racist with ties to the upper-echelon of the Republican Party, and some rather strange religious beliefs that have influenced highly questionable legal rulings:

Ethical complaint

Wikipedia

A group of civil rights organizations and legal ethicists filed a complaint of misconduct against Jones on June 4, 2013, after she allegedly said that “racial groups like African-Americans and Hispanics are predisposed to crime,” and are “prone to commit acts of violence” which are more “heinous” than members of other ethnic groups. … Jones also stated that a death sentence is a service to defendants because it allows them to make peace with God, and she “referred to her personal religious views as justification for the death penalty“.  Jones allegedly made the remarks during a speech to the University of Pennsylvania Federalist Society.

The website RHReality reports that the complaint “also alleged Jones improperly told another federal judge to ‘shut up’ during a court hearing.” No one is disputing that the complaint is valid, not even the defendant:

According to the panel of judges, however, even though Jones admitted to making many of the statements detailed in the ethics complaint, that conduct did not amount to judicial misconduct.

“It appears likely that Judge Jones did suggest that, statistically, African-Americans and/or Hispanics are ‘disproportionately’ involved in certain crimes and ‘disproportionately’ present in federal prisons,” the panel said. …

The three-member panel concluded that the evidence showed Jones used the term “red herring” when expressing her view that a challenge to the death penalty on the ground that “it is administered in a racially discriminatory manner is nonviable.” In light of Supreme Court precedents, the panel concluded “we again cannot find that such a view indicates improper bias or misconduct.”

The panel of judges dismissed the complaint against Jones in August but did not make the order publicly available until Wednesday, and only after civil rights groups announced they were appealing the decision to the Judicial Conference of the United States.

The judges investigating the allegations against Jones failed to interview student witnesses and discounted affidavits filed shortly after Jones’ speech, according to the appeal.

Judge Jones enters the next article from Texas Lawer obliquely, and whether she is responsible for the latest abortion ruling that has managed to close clinics and aggravate women’s rights activists across the country, she has made equally controversial decisions in the past. And note that she has close ties to the deciding panel of that ruling:

Who Wrote for the Majority in Controversial Abortion Decision?

John Council

Texas Lawyer

When a panel of three judges issued the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s most controversial decision of the year by upholding a Texas law that regulates—and potentially shuts down—seven abortion clinics on June 9, lawyers naturally wondered who wrote the decision.

All were disappointed as the first page of Whole Woman’s Health v. Cole labeled the panel decision as “per curiam”— a designation the appellate court reserves for short opinions on well-settled law that have little precedential value. That designation also means page 56 of Cole would have no signature identifying its author, although the decision names the panel members as Judges Ed Prado, Jennifer Elrod and Catharina Haynes. [See “Strict Regulation of Texas Abortion Clinics Upheld,” Texas Lawyer, June 9, 2015.]

“This is an unconventional use of a per curiam device because this is a lengthy, law-making opinion,” said Chris Kratovil, an appellate lawyer and member of the Dallas office of Dykema Cox Smith. “My assumption is that the panel released it as a per curiam opinion in an effort to demonstrate the clarity of the law and to minimize controversy.”

Kratovil, who formerly served as a law clerk for Fifth Circuit Judge Edith Jones, said that while it’s an unusual move to put a per curiam label on such a hot opinion, it’s an understandable one.

“The use of the per curiam also ensures that no one member of the court is singled out for a social media firestorm,” Kratovil said.

However, last year, when the Fifth Circuit rejected a stay of lower court rulings that deemed parts of the same Texas law unconstitutional, the decision was signed by Jones—who considered the case along with a panel that also included Elrod and Haynes. [See “Fifth Circuit Finds Abortion Provisions in H.B. 2 Constitutional,” Texas Lawyer, April 7, 2014.]

Jones has put her name on controversial abortion decisions before. In 2004, Jones wrote McCorvey v. Hill, an opinion that took both sides of the abortion debate by rejecting an attempt to vacate the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade in a majority opinion, but blasted Roe v. Wade in a concurring opinion that also contained her name. [See “Judge Takes Both Sides in Abortion Ruling,” Texas Lawyer, Sept. 27, 2004.]

“The world has changed, and not for the better,” Kratovil noted. “Any activist with a Twitter account or a Facebook page now has a platform. I don’t blame any member of the court for not wanting to be targeted with threats and hate mail.”

edith-jones-too-extreme2

So who is this radical fundamentalist who thinks the death penalty a gift, this legal harpie who wields a powerful judicial  hammer and loudly pounds holes in Roe vs. Wade? And given her political ties, why hasn’t the Texas Bar insisted forcefully that she recuse herself from all political decisions, particularly concerning abortion?:

Edith Jones and the GOP

Wikipedia

Edith Hollan Jones (born April 7, 1949) is a Judge and the former Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit…. She was in private practice in Houston, Texas, from 1974 until 1985, working for the firm of Andrews, Kurth, Campbell & Jones, where she became the firm’s first female partner. She specialized in bankruptcy law. She also served as General Counsel for the Republican Party of Texas from 1982-83.

She was nominated to the Fifth Circuit by President Ronald Reagan on February 27, 1985, and confirmed by the United States Senate on April 3, 1985….

She sits on the board of directors of the Boy Scouts of America and the Garland Walker American Inns of Court.

In 2010, Jones visited Iraq as part of the U.S. State Department’s Rule of Law program, where She advised and encouraged Iraqi and Kurdish judges.

Jones has been mentioned frequently as being on the list of potential nominees to the Supreme Court of the United States. A 1990 report from The New York Times cited her as George H.W. Bush’s second choice for the Supreme Court vacancy filled by Justice David Souter. The Chicago Sun-Times and several other newspapers reported on July 1, 2005, that she had also been considered for nomination to the Supreme Court during the presidency of George W. Bush.

— A.C.

“… The pleading filed by the bar’s then general counsel Davis Grant alleged that Belli was not a ‘reputable’ attorney and therefore should not be allowed to practice in the court under the State Bar’s rules of admission. …”

Long lost documents related to assassination of President John F. Kennedy are always fascinating when they are revealed—regardless of their association with a conspiracy.

And a 1966 casefile recently discovered by the Tarrant County District Clerk’s office proves one thing: The State Bar of Texas hated San Francisco lawyer Melvin Belli—so much that it took steps to ensure he could never practice in the Lone Star State’s courts again after defending Jack Ruby of murder in 1964.

The case file, State Bar of Texas v. Belli, was discovered earlier this month by clerks who are the process of digitizing all of county’s old case files for storage purposes, said Tarrant County District Clerk Tom Wilder. Wilder said that while most paper cases of that vintage are eventually discarded, cases like Belli are saved for their historical value.

“In reading the pleadings it seemed like it was just an attempt to take a whack at Melvin Belli,” Wilder said of the case file.

The pleading, filed in May of 1966 in Tarrant County’s 96th District Court, was filed there because Belli apparently had a case pending in that court at the time. The pleading filed by the bar’s then general counsel Davis Grant alleged that Belli was not a “reputable” attorney and therefore should not be allowed to practice in the court under the State Bar’s rules of admission.

The source of the bar’s ire, according to the pleadings, were the numerous colorful statements Belli gave to a hungry press after Ruby was convicted of murder for killing presidential assassin Lee Harvey Oswald. Many of the statements concerned Belli’s distaste for Texas’ criminal justice system—in particular Dallas District Judge Joe B. Brown, who presided over Ruby’s trial.

Belli represented Ruby pro bono and unsuccessfully argued to a Dallas County jury that Ruby was legally insane at the time he shot and killed Oswald.

One of Belli’s quotes, according to the pleading, included: “I think we have a good chance in the Criminal Court of Appeals. All Texas isn’t like this place here. They’re going to chastise this kangaroo pouch judge [Brown] who sat on this case. He didn’t walk to the bench; he hopped.”

Another Belli quote from the pleading: “I don’t need Judge Brown’s compliments. I’m sorry I shook hands. He has blood on it. He told me in private that he wouldn’t have given this case up for love or money.”

The bar’s pleading called on Belli to answer for his statements, lest he be barred from practicing in Texas courts. The pleading had numerous news articles featuring Belli’s hot quotes filed as attachments along with letter of support for the action from the American Bar Association and letters from individual Texas lawyers who did not care for Belli’s behavior.

Belli was unconcerned by the pleading. According a June 1966 letter he wrote to the judge of the 96th District Court, Belli indicated that he no intention of returning to Texas to face the allegations and denied that he or his law firm had any cases pending in Texas.

“We think, in view of the ex parte publicity given upon this same matter, my appearance in the Ruby case, both the American Bar and the Texas Bar, I should reply in kind publicly in the newspapers, however, I am presently constrained so to do,” Belli wrote. “This does not mean either that we are not anxious fully and publicly to contest the subject matter of the American Bar and the Texas Bar charges [they are both the same] or that we are loathe indefinitely to present our side to the public.”

“The letter was thumbing his nose, saying I’m not coming back down,” Wilder said of Belli, “which is typical.”

According to a marking on the file, the bar’s case against Belli was ultimately dismissed in 1968 for want of prosecution.

The once-forgotten Belli case file has been moved to a secure storage site, where it can be examined by permission along with other famous Tarrant County case filed —among them the murder case of wealthy Fort Worth oilman T. Cullen Davis—Wilder said.

“We’re going to keep the historical paper records to the extent that we can. Just the signatures have some historically value,” Wilder said. “That Belli signature would be worth some bucks at a memorabilia store.”