Fascists in White Coats: The CIA’s Dr. Louis Jolyon West & the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Instititute
Photo: In 1972, Dr. Louis J. West (deceased), a ranking CIA psychiatrist (also a director of the “conservative” American Family Foundation and the False Memory Syndrome Foundation, an organization founded by pedophile apologists that marginalizes victims of ritual abuse and libels their advocates) with an obsessive interest in mind control, proposed experimenting on the brains of blacks and Latinos (to determine why these minorities are “prone to violence”), prisoners, women and children at a secret psychiatric unit at an abandoned Nike missile base in the mountains near UCLA. According to Dr. West in private correspondence, “comparative studies could be carried out there, in an isolated but convenient location, of experimental or model programs for the alteration of undesirable behavior.” According to Dr. West, “The major known correlates of violence are sex (male), age (youthful), ethnicity (black), and urbanicity.” Dr. West advocated a wide range of treatments, including chemical castration, psychosurgery and experimental drugs, incorporating computer databases to track “pre-delinquent” youth for “preemptive” treatment of black youth with no criminal record. The proposed Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence was shot down a year later by the California State Legislature after the racist agenda of Dr. West’s barbaric psychiatric gulag was exposed by legitimate scientists and the press. — AC
Dr. Louis Jolyon “Jolly” West
Dr. West was the chief architect of the Center for the Study and Reduction of Violence as Director of the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute. [From] Samuel Chavkin’s work, “The Mind Stealers, Psychosurgery and Mind Control”  :
The center was to be set up to develop “behavioral indicators, profiles, biological correlates,” to assist “school administrators, law enforcement personnel and governmental departments” to detect and control “overt expression of life-threatening behavior by identifiable individuals and groups.”
In explaining the work of the center, Dr. West said that “in some patients, outbursts of uncontrolled rage have definitely been linked to abnormal electrical activity in deeply buried areas of the brain … For many years, neurologists have measured the electrical activity of the brain with electrodes attached to the scalp … Now by implanting tiny electrodes deep within the brain, electrical activity can be followed in areas that cannot be measured from the surface of the scalp.”
The future looked even more promising, Dr. West declared. “It is even possible to record bioelectrical changes in the brains of freely moving subjects, through the use of remote monitoring techniques.”
Many critics of Dr. West’s proposal were up in arms over the fact that two junior high schools would provide much of the source material for the investigation into the genetic factors which predisposed violence, “one in a predominantly black ethnic area; the other in a predominantly Chicano area.” One of most persistent critics of the center proposed by Dr. West was Dr. Isidore Ziferstein, associate clinical professor of psychiatry at the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute.
“We have a new situation on our hands,” Dr. Ziferstein said. “Because of the intensifying economic decline it is inevitable that more and more jobless will go beyond the limits of the law to satisfy their needs. There are probably upwards of 30 percent of our population who are permanently impoverished … And once these 30 percent become convinced that the democratic process is not working for them, they become desperate and may resort to violent means. There is a rising radicalism in their midst and there is an uppitiness among the blacks and the Chicano prisoners which prison officials find intolerable.
“To subdue them, the authorities are using new methods. They’re employing the psychiatric armamentarium and a new technological tool set — what has come to be known as psycho-technology. Under the guise of therapeutic behavior modification they’re applying anything from Anectine and other aversive drugs to psychosurgery.”
For the first time in the history of the United States, criteria were to be set up for the labeling of individuals believed to be potentially criminal, even though they had committed no crime … those to be drawn upon for experimentation would be children, minority group members, and prisoners.
Dr. Ziferstein scorned the idea of “predicting” which people are potentially violent. “This means labeling persons as potential criminals, and involves a serious threat to civil liberties.”
 Samuel Chavkin, “The Mind Stealers, Psychosurgery and Mind Control” (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 1978).